Lib Dem Act

This is the final draft of the Spring Federal conference motion, finalised in consultation with the motions advice service.

If the motion is accepted for debate then the amendment proposal process will begin and you will be able to table amendments to the motion that will be voted on at conference.

If you wish to add your name as a submitting rep for this motion, send a scanned document with your name, address, local party and signature to ewanhoyle@gmail.com If you don't have the capability to e-mail your signature, send me an e-mail and I will give you my address so that you can post your details (with signature) to me first class (time is short). The more reps support this motion, the greater the chance of it being accepted for debate, and the more forceful the demonstration of the strength of feeling within the party on this subject.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Best wishes and stay warm,

Ewan Hoyle.


Conference notes:

A) The continuing failure of a prohibitionist policy on psychoactive drugs to reduce consumption of these drugs in the UK and to tackle the many social, economic and health consequences of their use.

B) Problem drug users commit over half of all acquisitive crimes and account for around 95% of street prostitution

C) The destabilising influence the drugs trade is having internationally especially in Latin America, the Caribbean, West Africa, and Afghanistan, where up to 50% of Taliban income is from the opium trade.

D) A comprehensive survey by the WHO has demonstrated that there is no association between more stringent prohibition and lower levels of drug use. Progressive policies in Portugal and Switzerland have achieved excellent results and have broad public support.


Conference believes:

i) We have a moral duty to ensure that drug addicts are not compelled to harm themselves or others by funding their drug use through prostitution, acquisitive crime or drug dealing.

ii) Harm reduction should be paramount as a consideration in drugs policy and reduction in the use of drugs is a vitally important contributing factor in that effort.

iii) An end to prohibition would increase respect for and co-operation with our police forces, remove drug dealing as an attractive career path for our youth, remove a major driver of gang violence, reduce prison overcrowding and free up tens of thousands of police for other priorities.

iv) The treasury would benefit from billions of pounds in saved criminal justice costs. The population would benefit directly from reduced costs of crime and lowered insurance premiums.

v) Deaths, injuries and illness brought about by overdose, contaminants, blood-borne infection, general ignorance of safe use practices and ignorance of the mental health implications of drug use would be reduced.

vi) It is precisely because of the Liberal Democrats full support for the excellent work of the UN in promoting liberty, health, human rights, peace and security across the globe that we should campaign for the urgent reform of the drugs conventions which are clearly creating quite opposite effects.


Conference therefore calls for:

1) Prohibition to be replaced with a policy of strict regulation and control of the manufacture, distribution and sale of psychoactive drugs, and for this to be a key policy in the fight against acquisitive and organised crime, international terrorism, prostitution, mental and physical ill health, child neglect, unemployment and poverty.

2) Supervised consumption of prescribed or low-cost drugs to be available to drugs users who might otherwise deal drugs, commit acquisitive crime or engage in prostitution.

3) The consideration of a licensing scheme that would ensure education on each specific drug is administered before an individual is licensed to purchase it at a pharmacist or clinic, and that would ensure under 18s would not be able to purchase drugs - including alcohol and tobacco - in shops.

4) Close monitoring of patterns of use and the impacts of reform on public and societal health to be carried out while maintaining individual's rights for their drug use history to be completely confidential.

5) The opening of dialogue with our neighbours and allies to facilitate Britain gaining wide support from the international community for when we responsibly take the lead in this course of action.

Views: 5

Replies to This Discussion

I agree with this policy.
Ideally if we have the resources it would be good to forward it to agencies that specialise in drug misuse for their comments and feedback. Personally I am not an expert, but the policy looks sound to me.
Also it is very important that we should be aware of how this policy could be misrepresented in the media and our political opponents at our expense, and how we will counter this.
On this point in particular we need to demonstrate we have thought this through, otherwise the party establishment may understandably be reluctant to support this policy so close to a general election. They might propose instead to find a way of delaying the debate on this motion until after the next general election.
Thanks Geoffrey.

The motion is in broad agreement with the position of the Transform drug policy foundation. My position is one of very strict control and regulation at least as a starting point. The voters have to be reassured that this policy is a great way of keeping kids away from drugs, and ensuring people with problems can get help faster and easier. Our position currently could certainly be described as "soft on drugs". The control and regulation policy I call for would be "tough on drugs". I dislike the "coffee-shop" model for cannabis sales and think that everyone taking cannabis should first receive education on the warning signs of mental illness. They should also have the choice of a wide array of different cannabis strengths so that users don't continue to be pushed towards skunk by the economics of the illegal market. The control and regulation of drugs like heroin and crack has obvious benefits in reducing acquisitive crime, street prostitution and pushing. The headline goals should be protecting children from the dangers of drugs and vastly reducing the number of new users of heroin and crack and the harms caused by existing users. These goals are very achievable and would be extremely popular with the electorate.
Hi Ewan

Well done for all your hard work on this. As you know, I am not a Federal Rep so cannot be a signatory.

I suggest that, if you haven't already done so, you get this up on to the main Lib Dem webpage as soon as possible so that you can get the rquired nummber of signatures. What about your own Local Party Reps - have they signed it? I know todayis the deadline - I hope you achieved the right number. Alternatively, email it to all the Local Parties (contact details on the Lib Dem site) - it's a bit late now if you haven't got enough, but I'm sure it would still be worth it. If nothing else, it could still go in as an Emergency Motion.

Good luck!
Rebekah

RSS

© 2012   Published and promoted by and on behalf of the Liberal Democrat   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service